"Forgive me" I do not own the copyright for this image |
Setting wise, we start off in a
playhouse (which belongs to Anna’s brother, Oblonsky played by Matthew
Macfayden). As we zoom in on the stage, which states it is ‘Imperial Russia
1874’ we are then caught in the whirlwind of play to movie to play to movie
then play then finally to movie where Anna says she must leave to Moscow to
visit her brother. At first the setting seems intriguing but then it gets
rather lost. You go in a circle where the work place and workers becomes a
restaurant and waiters and it takes you out of the moment. If it was a play
made into a movie I could appreciate the compliments of trying to make it look
like one but it was a novel, therefore I found the changes in scenery and sets
distracting. Also, sometimes the scenes would change like a normal movie then
back into a play like set change, which made me go ‘what the f…where am
I?’ There are certain more symbolic
moments where it turns from play to movie to play like the horseracing and the
train scenes. However, one of the most stunning moments on screen was the dance
of the Count Vronsky (Aaron Johnson) and Anna.
Symbolically, she is dressed all in
black and the Count in all white. To me is screamed, he will be the beginning
of her end. They immediately take to the floor where at first all the dancers
freeze as they gracefully waltz by, then the dancers disappear and the world is
only of Anna and the Count. It is then we know Anna’s fate is sealed and the
rest of the movie is going to be a chaotic dance between Anna and the Count and
the world around them they wish to ignore. With the Count (who is always seen
in white or white and pale blue) she is always wearing white as well, as if she
is pure and new again with this new love. It is only at the end where she is
caught between the world of her husband and her love the Count she wears red,
for she will commit the ultimate sacrifice of her love. The symbolism of the train is rather strong
too. On trains does Anna go between Moscow and St. Petersburg, from one love/life
to another and ultimately becomes her demise.
Besides Anna Karenina’s storyline
we have one with Konstatin Dimitrivich Levin (Dornhnall Gleeson) and Kitty
Shcherbatsky (Alicia Vikander) who at first start off on a bad note, when Kitty
rejects his wedding offer because she secretly loves the Count. I didn’t care
much for this storyline but the end through a rather touching scene of using
children’s spelling blocks the characters rekindle the flame that was dying and
their storyline of love flourishes and blooms, while Anna’s storyline slowly
spirals out of control. Thankfully with that one couple, even though it takes
away from the major characters and storyline (hello, the movie is called Anna
Karenina for a reason) it gave the audience something and someone to root for
when Anna’s love life was beyond repair.
Overall, the acting was superb.
Jude Law is barely recognizable as Alexi Karenin with how silent but deadly his
character could be. Keira Knightley as Anna was very well done; she plays the
part of a slowly detraining woman very well and knows how to captivate the
audience in her life and struggles. The rest of the cast wasn’t all too
memberable for me, besides Anna’s brother who clearly was a sarcastic, comedic
relief of the story in a way. The storylines were intricate and very well
developed and I never was lost, which is a plus for such a heavy loaded cast
such as this one. Setting, I did enjoy the ornate and elaborate scenes of the
playhouse, opera, home of Anna and Alexi and the home of Anna and the Count,
the dance hall, trains and the meadows but starting off the movie as a play was
confusing and jutting back to the ‘play within a movie’ style was distracting and
didn’t strike me as intriguing.
No comments:
Post a Comment